Mostly, we define performance in terms of measurement. Outputs. Results. Outcomes.

Our internal dialogue might be: “We performed at the top of our game. And we know that because of these top results.”

We’re interested in the bottom line. And that makes plenty of sense.

But if we want to architect performance, improve performance, deliver performance … a focus purely on results is misplaced.

Because results are reflective. Results are not where performance COMES FROM.

Performance is a product of focusing on the process, not the result. Yes, we want to keep a weathered-eye on results. But we want consistent time and attention spent on the PROCESS.

So, let’s experiment with redefining “performance” in terms of the process, not the result.

Take any area of life or work where you want to amplify the performance, and define that amplified “performance” in terms of the process.

What would that look like? What would be markedly different from how we’re doing things today? What new skills would need to be developed? What new allotments of time and focus would be required? What habits and practices might need to be introduced? What shifts in the thinking would be required?

And with those answers: go build and execute that process. The results will take care of themselves.

Thanks for reading!

I really appreciate your readership. And if you’d like to receive new articles, as they become available and direct to your inbox, you can do that in the form below or you can subscribe here.